David Schwartz Says Selling XRP Doesn't Make Him The Villain
06 May 2026 · 09:30 UTC · NewsBTC RSS Feed · Original source
Read original at NewsBTC RSS Feed →
Summary
Former Ripple CTO David Schwartz publicly defended his early exits from major cryptocurrency holdings in response to criticism from the XRP community. Schwartz disclosed selling 40,000 Ethereum at $1.05 each (now worth approximately $94 million), most of his Bitcoin at $1,000 to $7,500 per coin, and the majority of his XRP at $0.10 despite never believing it would reach $0.25. Community members have criticized his early exits as evidence of poor judgment and lack of commitment. Recently, Schwartz expressed skepticism about whether XRP could reach community-held price targets of $100 or $10,000, prompting backlash. On X, Schwartz argued that selling assets when financially beneficial is not morally inferior to buying, that he applied the same philosophy to Bitcoin and Ethereum without drawing similar criticism, and that this principle originated in early Bitcoin community values. When challenged that project builders have a duty to hold their tokens, Schwartz rejected the argument as illogical while confirming he still holds over 1 million XRP. Regarding price targets, Schwartz employed a market-based argument: if wealthy investors genuinely believed in a $10,000 target with even 1% probability, competitive buying would have already pushed XRP to $20. Community members countered by citing his earlier skepticism about $0.25 reaching as a reason to question his current price ceiling assessment. Schwartz has maintained his position without revision.
Why it matters
Schwartz's elevated status within the crypto ecosystem due to his executive history at Ripple ensures his statements receive market attention, but several factors constrain practical impact. First, this is opinion content rather than fundamental news, regulatory announcements, or material business developments; sentiment shifts from commentary alone are typically limited and short-lived. Second, his track record of early exits creates a credibility paradox—his arguments are logically sound, but his historical outcomes were sub-optimal, creating cognitive dissonance in the market. Third, crypto markets are highly speculative and don't always follow rational efficient-market assumptions; the absence of institutional buying pressure doesn't definitively eliminate the possibility of future price discovery at extreme levels. Fourth, XRP holders may have already priced in skeptical views or may simply disagree with his assessment, limiting the shock value. Fifth, the article itself is secondary commentary rather than a primary announcement, reducing its information value. Daily timescales should see the largest impact as retail traders and sentiment-focused investors react emotionally, while weekly and monthly predictions revert toward neutral as other market drivers (adoption news, regulatory clarity, macroeconomic factors) dominate price discovery.
Expected impact
David Schwartz's public defense of his early exits and skepticism toward extreme XRP price targets is likely to create modest negative sentiment pressure on XRP in the short-to-medium term. His logical market-based argument—that wealthy investors would have already bid XRP to $20 if they believed in a $10,000 target—carries intellectual weight but may alienate bullish community members invested in higher price expectations. The article's highlighting of his poor historical timing (selling ETH at $1.05, Bitcoin at $1,000-$7,500) further undermines confidence in his current analysis, despite his defense that these were rational financial decisions. As a former Ripple CTO, Schwartz commands attention from institutional investors and informed community members, lending some credibility to his skepticism. However, the XRP community appears divided, with many dismissing his concerns. Bitcoin should experience minimal direct impact since the commentary focuses on XRP dynamics. The net effect is likely a small negative XRP sentiment adjustment within 24-48 hours, with longer-term effects diminishing as market fundamentals reassert dominance over individual opinions.